Re: [RFC v10 0/4] pstore/block: new support logger for block devices

[liaoweixiong]

On 2019-02-26 19:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:33:41PM +0800, liaoweixiong wrote:
>> Why should we need pstore_block?
>> 1. Most embedded intelligent equipment have no persistent ram, which
>> increases costs. We perfer to cheaper solutions, like block devices.
>> In fast, there is already a sample for block device logger in driver
>> MTD (drivers/mtd/mtdoops.c).
>> 2. Do not any equipment have battery, which means that it lost all data
>> on general ram if power failure. Pstore has little to do for these
>> equipments.
>>
>> [PATCH v10]
> 
> Why are you still labeling these as "RFC"?  No one should actually be
> applying a Request For Comments patchset, as you obviously are not
> thinking it is ready to be merged :(
> 
> After 10 revisions, I hope you are confident in this patchset :)
> 

I'm confident in this patchset :) . It is first time for me to submit
RFC patches, i just don't know i should change the label to PATCH. Thank
you for reminding me.

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

-- 
liaoweixiong