Re: [PATCH 2/6] ptrace: introduce ptrace_syscall_enter to consolidate PTRACE_SYSEMU handling

[Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)]

On 2019/3/1 2:32, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Currently each architecture handles PTRACE_SYSEMU in very similar way.
> It's completely arch independent and can be handled in the code helping
> to consolidate PTRACE_SYSEMU handling.
>
> Let's introduce a hook 'ptrace_syscall_enter' that arch specific syscall
> entry code can call.
>

The 'ptrace_syscall_enter' is dedicated for PTRACE_SYSEMU flag,
So I suggest to rename the function to something like 'ptrace_syscall_emu_enter".

> +/*
> + * Hook to check and report for PTRACE_SYSEMU, can be called from arch
> + * arch syscall entry code
> + */
> +long ptrace_syscall_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +#ifdef TIF_SYSCALL_EMU
> +if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) {
> +if (tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs));

Shall we remove the semi-colon at end of the above line?

> +return -1L;
> +}
> +#endif
> +return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Detach all tasks we were using ptrace on. Called with tasklist held
>   * for writing.
>
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.