RE: [PATCH v3 6/6] dt-bindings: fpga: Add bindings for ZynqMP fpga driver
From: Nava kishore Manne
Date: Tue Mar 05 2019 - 04:42:40 EST
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the quick response.
Please find my response inline.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring [mailto:robh@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 10:57 PM
> To: Nava kishore Manne <navam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; Michal Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rajan Vaja
> <RAJANV@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jolly Shah
> <JOLLYS@xxxxxxxxxx>; chinnikishore369@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] dt-bindings: fpga: Add bindings for ZynqMP fpga
> driver
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 5:35 AM Nava kishore Manne <navam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > Thanks for providing the review comments..
> > Please find my response inline.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rob Herring [mailto:robh@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2019 2:01 AM
> > > To: Nava kishore Manne <navam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; Michal Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rajan
> > > Vaja <RAJANV@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > linux- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jolly
> > > Shah <JOLLYS@xxxxxxxxxx>; chinnikishore369@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] dt-bindings: fpga: Add bindings for
> > > ZynqMP fpga driver
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:46 PM Nava kishore Manne
> > > <navam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Rob,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for providing the comments...
> > >
> > > Please fix your mailer to send plain text emails to mail lists.
> > >
> > Thanks for pointing it..
> >
> > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > >
> > > > > From: Rob Herring [mailto:robh@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > > >
> > > > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 9:19 PM
> > > >
> > > > > To: Nava kishore Manne <navam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > > Cc: mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; Michal Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> > > > > Rajan Vaja
> > > >
> > > > > <RAJANV@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > > linux-
> > > >
> > > > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jolly Shah
> > > >
> > > > > <JOLLYS@xxxxxxxxxx>; chinnikishore369@xxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] dt-bindings: fpga: Add bindings for
> > > > > ZynqMP fpga
> > > >
> > > > > driver
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 11:08:35PM +0530, Nava kishore Manne wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > Add documentation to describe Xilinx ZynqMP fpga driver bindings.
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nava kishore Manne <nava.manne@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > > > Changes for v3:
> > > >
> > > > > > -Removed PCAP as a child node to the
> > > > > > FW and Created
> > > >
> > > > > > an independent node since PCAP driver
> > > > > > is a consumer
> > > >
> > > > > > not a provider.
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > .../bindings/fpga/xlnx,zynqmp-pcap-fpga.txt | 13 +++++++++++++
> > > >
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > > > create mode 100644
> > > >
> > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/xlnx,zynqmp-pcap-fpga.t
> > > > > > xt
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > diff --git
> > > >
> > > > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/xlnx,zynqmp-pcap-fpga
> > > > > > .txt
> > > >
> > > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/xlnx,zynqmp-pcap-fpga
> > > > > > .txt
> > > >
> > > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > >
> > > > > > index 000000000000..1f6f58872311
> > > >
> > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > >
> > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/xlnx,zynqmp-pcap-
> > > > > > +++ fpga
> > > > > > +++ .txt
> > > >
> > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> > > >
> > > > > > +Device Tree zynqmp-fpga bindings for the Zynq Ultrascale+
> > > > > > +MPSoC
> > > >
> > > > > > +controlled using ZynqMP SoC firmware interface For Bitstream
> > > >
> > > > > > +configuration on ZynqMp Soc uses processor configuration
> > > >
> > > > > > +port(PCAP) to configure the programmable logic(PL) through PS
> > > > > > +by
> > > >
> > > > > > +using FW interface.
> > > >
> > > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > > > +Required properties:
> > > >
> > > > > > +- compatible: should contain "xlnx,zynqmp-pcap-fpga"
> > > >
> > > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > > > +Example:
> > > >
> > > > > > + zynqmp_pcap: pcap {
> > > >
> > > > > > + compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-pcap-fpga";
> > > >
> > > > > > + };
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > There's no need for a DT node. Just make the firware driver
> > > > > create a platform
> > > >
> > > > > device for pcap.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This driver being used by the FPGA manager framework(fpga-region)
> > > > to apply
> > > overlay's so this node is needed AFAIK.
> > >
> > > The binding says nothing about child nodes and what they are. Please
> > > define that.
> > >
> > Do you mean I need to add the example usage of the pcap node like as below
> in the binding doc?
>
> You can have an example, but no, I meant you need say something like "The
> pcap node may have 1 or more child nodes which have an 'fpga-region'
> compatible.
> >
> > Device Tree Example for Full Reconfiguration
> > ============================================
> >
> > Live Device Tree contains:
> >
> > zynqmp_pcap: pcap {
> > compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-pcap-fpga";
> > };
> >
> > fpga_region0: fpga-region0 {
>
> This should be a child of pcap.
>
AFAIK we can't put the fpga-region as a child of pcap as both are independent and they refered to each other using phandlers
I have made this changes by looking into the below reference doc.
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/fpga-region.txt
> > compatible = "fpga-region";
> > fpga-mgr = <&zynqmp_pcap>;
> > #address-cells = <0x1>;
> > #size-cells = <0x1>;
> > ranges;
> > };
> >
> > DT Overlay contains:
>
> Don't show overlays in examples. Just show a final tree (i.e. base with overlay
> applied).
To get a better picture for the users i have added this example node with overlays
I feel it's good to have this info because it will not impact the functionality of PCAP node.
Please let me know if you still want me to make this example without overlay node.
Regards,
Navakishore.