Re: arch/arm/kernel/setup.c fails to compile for NOMMU

[Stefan Agner]

Hi Michal,

On 06.04.2018 11:56, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 25-08-17 08:45:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Thu 24-08-17 17:17:41, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 01:24:02PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> > > Hi Russel,
>> > > I have a battery of configs for compile testing and for some time I've
>> > > been seeing the following compilation error with nommu config (attached)
>> > >
>> > > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c: In function 'reserve_crashkernel':
>> > > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:1005:25: error: 'SECTION_SIZE' undeclared (first
>> > > use in this function)
>> > >              crash_size, SECTION_SIZE);
>> > >
>> > > I didn't get to look what is going on here, maybe my config is just too
>> > > artificial but the primary reason is that SECTION_SIZE is not defined in
>> > > pgtable-nommu.h. To be honest I am not familiar with nommu very much and
>> > > it smells like the whole reserve_crashkernel doesn't really make any
>> > > sense on those configs. Could you have a look what is the best fix
>> > > please?
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I suspect that mach-netx has never been tested in nommu configurations
>> > (ditto for many of the older platforms, which pre-date merging nommu
>> > support.)
>> >
>> > Maybe the best solution is to make these old platforms depend on MMU.
>> >
>> > However, I'm wondering whether kexec makes sense for !MMU - that's
>> > probably something that hasn't been tested and doesn't actually work.
>> > So maybe another approach would be to make kexec depend on MMU for
>> > ARM - but I'm afraid I don't really know.
>>
>> Yeah, I've disabled KEXEC in my testing config. All I do care about is
>> to test nommu specific code paths in MM code.
>>
>> > I only have very limited nommu experience.
>>
>> me too
>>
>> So what would you say about the following?
> 
> It's been some time and it seems this has fallen between cracks. Is this
> worth puruing or I should just forget about it and drop it on the floor?

I actually came across this issue during some randconfig testing. Your
change looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx>

Fixes for the ARM core usually go through Russell's patch tracker, did
you submit you patch there?

See also:
https://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/info.php

--
Stefan

>> ---
>> From 2707f3bf00181bbc9dcf6a1f287eb7369141e955 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 08:40:09 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] arm: make kexec depend on MMU
>>
>> arm nommu config with KEXEC enabled doesn't compile
>> arch/arm/kernel/setup.c: In function 'reserve_crashkernel':
>> arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:1005:25: error: 'SECTION_SIZE' undeclared (first
>> use in this function)
>>              crash_size, SECTION_SIZE);
>>
>> since 61603016e212 ("ARM: kexec: fix crashkernel= handling") which is
>> over one year without anybody noticing. I have only noticed beause of
>> my testing nommu config which somehow gained CONFIG_KEXEC without
>> an intention. This suggests that nobody is actually using KEXEC
>> on nommu ARM configs. It is even a question whether kexec works with
>> nommu.
>>
>> Make KEXEC depend on MMU to make this clear. If somebody wants to enable
>> there will be probably more things to take care.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> index 3f4aa9179337..c8603195d7fc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> @@ -2003,6 +2003,7 @@ config KEXEC
>>  	bool "Kexec system call (EXPERIMENTAL)"
>>  	depends on (!SMP || PM_SLEEP_SMP)
>>  	depends on !CPU_V7M
>> +	depends on MMU
>>  	select KEXEC_CORE
>>  	help
>>  	  kexec is a system call that implements the ability to shutdown your
>> --
>> 2.13.2
>>
>> --
>> Michal Hocko
>> SUSE Labs