Re: [PATCH] xfrm: Reset secpath in xfrm failure

[Steffen Klassert]

On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 04:33:08PM +0900, Myungho Jung wrote:
> In esp4_gro_receive() and esp6_gro_receive(), secpath can be allocated
> without adding xfrm state to xvec. Then, sp->xvec[sp->len - 1] would
> fail and result in dereferencing invalid pointer in esp4_gso_segment()
> and esp6_gso_segment(). Reset secpath if xfrm function returns error.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+b69368fd933c6c592f4c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Myungho Jung <mhjungk@xxxxxxxxx>

The patch itself looks ok, but please add a 'Fixes' tag to
the commit message.

Thanks!