Re: [PATCH v5 00/18] mfd: demodularization of non-modular drivers

[Pavel Machek]

> > Pavel, I hope this more extended explanation makes sense to you, and
> > that you simply have not seen me write these same details in the past.
> 
> Blimey.  That's a really long winded way of saying:
> 
>   "Modular-ness is actually broken in these drivers; [Paul]'s patches
>    make that point clear for all to see.  If people (authors/distros)
>    wish them to be modular, they need to fix them properly."

Has that been checked?

I mean... when I saw the patch I thought "perhaps it should be doing
bool->tristate instead"?

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature