Re: [PATCH 1/3] timekeeping: add missing non-_ns functions for fast accessors
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Fri Jun 21 2019 - 10:41:04 EST
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:33 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:29 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Typo: you have the same function names listed twice here,
> > one of them should be ktime_get_mono_fast() instead of
> > ktime_get_mono_fast_ns().
>
> Nice catch. Vim twitches gone crazy.
>
> > Also, we might want to rename ktime_get_boot_fast_ns()
> > to ktime_get_boottime_fast_ns in the process. It seems there
> > is only a single caller.
>
> And tai -> clocktai on the others. I can send a followup patch to
> unify all those after this set.
Yes, that's probably best.
Arnd