Re: [PATCH 11/16] mm: consolidate the get_user_pages* implementations

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 04:40:57PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> @@ -2168,7 +2221,7 @@ static void gup_pgd_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>   */
>  static bool gup_fast_permitted(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>  {
> -	return true;
> +	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_FAST_GUP) ? true : false;

The ?: is needed with IS_ENABLED?

>  }
>  #endif

Oh, you fixed the util.c this way instead of the headerfile
#ifdef..

I'd suggest to revise this block a tiny bit:

-#ifndef gup_fast_permitted
+#if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_FAST_GUP) || !defined(gup_fast_permitted)
 /*
  * Check if it's allowed to use __get_user_pages_fast() for the range, or
  * we need to fall back to the slow version:
  */
-bool gup_fast_permitted(unsigned long start, int nr_pages)
+static bool gup_fast_permitted(unsigned long start, int nr_pages)
 {

Just in case some future arch code mismatches the header and kconfig..

Regards,
Jason