Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] e1000e: Make speed detection on hotplugging cable more reliable

[Paul Menzel]

Dear Kai Heng,


(with or without hyphen?)

On 7/15/19 11:00 AM, Kai Heng Feng wrote:
> at 4:52 PM, Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> On 7/15/19 10:43 AM, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>>> After hotplugging an 1Gbps ethernet cable with 1Gbps link partner, the
>>> MII_BMSR may reports 10Mbps, renders the network rather slow.
>>
>> s/may reports/may report/
>> s/renders/rendering/
> 
> Apparently English isnât my mother tongue ;)

No problem. Mine neither.

>>> The issue has much lower fail rate after commit 59653e6497d1 ("e1000e:
>>> Make watchdog use delayed work"), which esssentially introduces some
>>
>> essentially
> 
> Ok.
> 
>>> delay before running the watchdog task.
>>>
>>> But there's still a chance that the hotplugging event and the queued
>>> watchdog task gets run at the same time, then the original issue can be
>>> observed once again.
>>>
>>> So let's use mod_delayed_work() to add a deterministic 1 second delay
>>> before running watchdog task, after an interrupt.
>>
>> I am not clear about the effects for the user. Could you elaborate
>> please? Does the link now come up up to one second later?
> 
> Yes, the link will be up on a fixed one second later.
> 
> The delay varies between 0 to 2 seconds without this patch.

Is there no other fix? Regarding booting a system fast (less than six
seconds), a fixed one second delay is quite a regression on systems where
it worked before.

>>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Any bug URL?
> 
> If maintainers think itâs necessary then Iâll file one.

Not necessary, if there is none. I thought you had one in Launchpad or so.


Kind regards,

Paul

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature