Re: [PATCH v12 1/5] can: m_can: Create a m_can platform framework

[Dan Murphy]

Hello

On 7/24/19 1:47 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:14:14AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > On 7/10/19 7:08 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > On 6/17/19 10:09 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > > > Marc
> > > >
> > > > On 6/10/19 11:35 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > > > > Bump
> > > > >
> > > > > On 6/6/19 8:16 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > > > > > Marc
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bump
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/31/19 6:51 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > > > > > > Marc
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/15/19 3:54 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > > > > > > > Marc
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/9/19 11:11 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Create a m_can platform framework that peripheral
> > > > > > > > > devices can register to and use common code and register sets.
> > > > > > > > > The peripheral devices may provide read/write and configuration
> > > > > > > > > support of the IP.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@xxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > v12 - Update the m_can_read/write functions to
> > > > > > > > > create a backtrace if the callback
> > > > > > > > > pointer is NULL. - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1052302/
> > > > > > > > Is this able to be merged now?
> > > > > > > ping
> > > > Wondering if there is anything else we need to do?
> > > >
> > > > The part has officially shipped and we had hoped to have driver
> > > > support in Linux as part of the announcement.
> > > Is this being sent in a PR for 5.3?
> > >
> > > Dan
> > Adding Greg to this thread as I have no idea what is going on with this.
> Why me?  What am I supposed to do here?  I see no patches at all to do
> anything with :(

I am not sure who to email. The maintainer seems to be on hiatus or 
super busy with other work.

So I added you to see if you know how to handle this. Wolfgang Acked it 
but he said Marc needs to pull

it in. We have quite a few users of this patchset. I have been hosting 
the patchset in a different tree.

These users keep pinging us for upstream status and all we can do is 
point them to the

LKML to show we are continuing to pursue inclusion.

https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=393454

Thanks
Dan


> thanks,
>
> greg "not a miracle worker" k-h