Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] coccinelle: Add script to check for platform_get_irq() excessive prints

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Markus Elfring (2019-07-24 02:30:16)
> I would prefer to concentrate the usage of SmPL disjunctions on changing
> implementation details so that the specification of duplicate code
> can be avoided.
> 
> 
> > +(
> > +platform_get_irq(E, ...)
> > +|
> > +platform_get_irq_byname(E, ...)
> > +);
> 
> Function names:
> 
> +(platform_get_irq
> +|platform_get_irq_byname
> +)(E, ...);
> 
> 
> > +if ( \( ret < 0 \| ret <= 0 \) )
> 
> Comparison operators:
> 
> +if (ret \( < \| <= \) 0)
> 

Thanks. Will fold the above two in.

> 
> > +if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> 
> Is it appropriate to treat this error code check as optional
> by the shown transformation approach?
> Can this case distinction be omitted?

I don't know what you mean here. Do you want me to drop this part so
that EPROBE_DEFER checks don't get removed?