[PATCH 27/28] perf record: Support aarch64 random socket_id assignment

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

From: Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@xxxxxxxxxx>

Same as in the commit 01766229533f ("perf record: Support s390 random
socket_id assignment"), aarch64 also have this problem.

Without this fix:

  [root@localhost perf]# ./perf report --header -I -v
  ...
  socket_id number is too big.You may need to upgrade the perf tool.

  # ========
  # captured on    : Thu Aug  1 22:58:38 2019
  # header version : 1
  ...
  # Core ID and Socket ID information is not available
  ...

With this fix:
  [root@localhost perf]# ./perf report --header -I -v
  ...
  cpumask list: 0-31
  cpumask list: 32-63
  cpumask list: 64-95
  cpumask list: 96-127

  # ========
  # captured on    : Thu Aug  1 22:58:38 2019
  # header version : 1
  ...
  # CPU 0: Core ID 0, Socket ID 36
  # CPU 1: Core ID 1, Socket ID 36
  ...
  # CPU 126: Core ID 126, Socket ID 8442
  # CPU 127: Core ID 127, Socket ID 8442
  ...

Signed-off-by: Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware) <tz.stoyanov@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1564717737-21602-1-git-send-email-tanxiaojun@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/perf/util/header.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
index b04c2b6b28b3..1f2965a07bef 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
@@ -2252,8 +2252,10 @@ static int process_cpu_topology(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused)
 	/* On s390 the socket_id number is not related to the numbers of cpus.
 	 * The socket_id number might be higher than the numbers of cpus.
 	 * This depends on the configuration.
+	 * AArch64 is the same.
 	 */
-	if (ph->env.arch && !strncmp(ph->env.arch, "s390", 4))
+	if (ph->env.arch && (!strncmp(ph->env.arch, "s390", 4)
+			  || !strncmp(ph->env.arch, "aarch64", 7)))
 		do_core_id_test = false;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < (u32)cpu_nr; i++) {
-- 
2.21.0