Re: [PATCH] x86/umip: Add emulation for 64-bit processes

[Ingo Molnar]

* hpa@xxxxxxxxx <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I would strongly suggest that we change the term "emulation" to 
> "spoofing" for these instructions. We need to explain that we do *not* 
> execute these instructions the was the CPU would have, and unlike the 
> native instructions do not leak kernel information.

Ok, I've edited the patch to add the 'spoofing' wording where 
appropriate, and I also made minor fixes such as consistently 
capitalizing instruction names.

Can I also add your Reviewed-by tag?

So the patch should show up in tip:x86/asm today-ish, and barring any 
complications is v5.4 material.

Thanks,

	Ingo