Re: [PATCH] x86/umip: Add emulation for 64-bit processes

[hpa]

On September 10, 2019 7:28:28 AM GMT+01:00, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>* hpa@xxxxxxxxx <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I would strongly suggest that we change the term "emulation" to 
>> "spoofing" for these instructions. We need to explain that we do
>*not* 
>> execute these instructions the was the CPU would have, and unlike the
>
>> native instructions do not leak kernel information.
>
>Ok, I've edited the patch to add the 'spoofing' wording where 
>appropriate, and I also made minor fixes such as consistently 
>capitalizing instruction names.
>
>Can I also add your Reviewed-by tag?
>
>So the patch should show up in tip:x86/asm today-ish, and barring any 
>complications is v5.4 material.
>
>Thanks,
>
>	Ingo

Yes, please do.

Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.