RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 6/8] mtd: spinand: micron: Turn driver implementation generic

[Shivamurthy Shastri (sshivamurthy)]

Hello Miquel & Boris,

Just a gentle reminder that I'd like some feedback.

Thanks,
Shiva

> 
> Hi Boris,
> 
> I need your opinion on the question below.
> 
> "Shivamurthy Shastri (sshivamurthy)" <sshivamurthy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> on
> Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:03:38 +0000:
> 
> > Hi Miquel,
> >
> > >
> > > Hi Shiva,
> > >
> > > shiva.linuxworks@xxxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 22 Jul 2019 07:56:19 +0200:
> > >
> > > > From: Shivamurthy Shastri <sshivamurthy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > >
> > > I am not sure the "turn implemenatation generic" title describes what
> > > you do.
> > >
> > > > Driver is redesigned using parameter page to support Micron SPI NAND
> > > > flashes.
> > >
> > > Redesigned is perhaps a bit too much.
> > >
> > > "
> > > > The reason why spinand_select_op_variant globalized is that the
> Micron
> > > > driver no longer calling spinand_match_and_init.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Shivamurthy Shastri <sshivamurthy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c   |  2 +-
> > > >  drivers/mtd/nand/spi/micron.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> -----
> > > ---
> > > >  include/linux/mtd/spinand.h   |  4 +++
> > > >  3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> > > > index 7ae76dab9141..aae715d388b7 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> > > > @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static void
> spinand_manufacturer_cleanup(struct
> > > spinand_device *spinand)
> > > >  		return spinand->manufacturer->ops->cleanup(spinand);
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > -static const struct spi_mem_op *
> > > > +const struct spi_mem_op *
> > > >  spinand_select_op_variant(struct spinand_device *spinand,
> > > >  			  const struct spinand_op_variants *variants)
> > > >  {
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/micron.c
> > > b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/micron.c
> > > > index 95bc5264ebc1..6fde93ec23a1 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/micron.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/micron.c
> > > > @@ -90,22 +90,10 @@ static int micron_ecc_get_status(struct
> > > spinand_device *spinand,
> > > >  	return -EINVAL;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > -static const struct spinand_info micron_spinand_table[] = {
> > > > -	SPINAND_INFO("MT29F2G01ABAGD", 0x24,
> > > > -		     NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 128, 64, 2048, 40, 2, 1, 1),
> > > > -		     NAND_ECCREQ(8, 512),
> > > > -		     SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants,
> > > > -					      &write_cache_variants,
> > > > -					      &update_cache_variants),
> > > > -		     0,
> > > > -		     SPINAND_ECCINFO(&micron_ooblayout_ops,
> > > > -				     micron_ecc_get_status)),
> > > > -};
> > > > -
> > >
> > > I don't know if it is wise to drop this structure.
> > >
> > > >  static int micron_spinand_detect(struct spinand_device *spinand)
> > > >  {
> > > > +	const struct spi_mem_op *op;
> > > >  	u8 *id = spinand->id.data;
> > > > -	int ret;
> > > >
> > > >  	/*
> > > >  	 * Micron SPI NAND read ID need a dummy byte,
> > > > @@ -114,16 +102,55 @@ static int micron_spinand_detect(struct
> > > spinand_device *spinand)
> > > >  	if (id[1] != SPINAND_MFR_MICRON)
> > > >  		return 0;
> > > >
> > > > -	ret = spinand_match_and_init(spinand, micron_spinand_table,
> > > > -				     ARRAY_SIZE(micron_spinand_table),
> > > id[2]);
> > >
> > > I am not sure this is the right solution. I would keep this call and
> > > overwrite what you need to overwrite with the fixup hook.
> > >
> >
> > Then, I will have dummy structure like below.
> >
> > static const struct spinand_info micron_spinand_table[] = {
> >         SPINAND_INFO(NULL, 0,
> >                      NAND_MEMORG(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
> >                      NAND_ECCREQ(0, 0),
> >                      SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants,
> >                                               &write_cache_variants,
> >                                               &update_cache_variants),
> >                      0,
> >                      SPINAND_ECCINFO(&micron_ooblayout_ops,
> >                                      micron_ecc_get_status)),
> > };
> >
> > Let me know if you are thinking for different approach.
> >
> 
> Thanks,
> MiquÃl