Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: add exfat filesystem code to
From: Ju Hyung Park
Date: Tue Sep 17 2019 - 02:04:41 EST
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:47 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's the fact that it actually was in a form that could be merged, no
> one has done that with the sdfat code :)
Well, I'm more than happy to help if you guys are happy with merging
the new base.
> What fixes? That's what I'm asking here.
I gave this as an example in my previous email:
https://github.com/MotorolaMobilityLLC/kernel-msm/commit/7ab1657
> How do we "know" that this is better than what we currently have today?
> We don't, so it's a bit hard to tell someone, "delete the work you did
> and replace it with this other random chunk of code, causing you a bunch
> more work in the process for no specific reason other than it looks
> 'newer'." :(
The new sdFAT base I'm suggesting, is just as "random" as the one
staging tree is based on.
If exFAT gets merged to Torvald's tree, there will be a lot more eyes
interested in it.
If there's a better base, we better switch to it now and prevent
further headaches long-term.
It's really hard to compare those 2 drivers base and extract
meaningful changelogs.
But regardless, here are some diff stats:
<Full diff stat>
Kconfig | 79 +-
Makefile | 46 +-
api.c | 423 ----
api.h | 310 ---
blkdev.c | 409 +---
cache.c | 1142 ++++-----
config.h | 49 -
core.c | 5583 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
core.h | 196 --
core_exfat.c | 1553 ------------
exfat.h | 1309 +++++++----
exfat_fs.h | 417 ----
extent.c | 351 ---
fatent.c | 182 --
misc.c | 401 ----
nls.c | 490 ++--
super.c | 5103 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
upcase.c | 740 ++++++
upcase.h | 407 ----
version.h | 29 -
xattr.c | 136 --
21 files changed, 8186 insertions(+), 11169 deletions(-)
<diff-filter=M>
Kconfig | 79 +-
Makefile | 46 +-
blkdev.c | 409 +---
cache.c | 1142 +++++-----
core.c | 5583 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
exfat.h | 1309 ++++++++----
nls.c | 490 ++---
super.c | 5103 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
8 files changed, 7446 insertions(+), 6715 deletions(-)
> I recommend looking at what we have in the tree now, and seeing what is
> missing compared to "sdfat". I know a lot of places in the exfat code
> that needs to be fixed up, odds are they are the same stuff that needs
> to be resolved in sdfat as well.
Would there be any more data that I can provide?
It's really hard to go through the full diff :(
Thanks.