[PATCH 1/2] x86/mm: consolidate bad_area handling to the end

From: Wei Yang
Date: Wed Sep 18 2019 - 22:09:18 EST


There are totally 7 bad_area[_nosemaphore] error branch in
do_user_addr_fault().

Consolidate all these handling to the end to make the code a little
neat.

BTW, after doing so, function bad_area is not used any more. Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 9ceacd1156db..9d18b73b5f77 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -933,12 +933,6 @@ __bad_area(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
__bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, error_code, address, pkey, si_code);
}

-static noinline void
-bad_area(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, unsigned long address)
-{
- __bad_area(regs, error_code, address, 0, SEGV_MAPERR);
-}
-
static inline bool bad_area_access_from_pkeys(unsigned long error_code,
struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
@@ -1313,19 +1307,14 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
if (unlikely(cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SMAP) &&
!(hw_error_code & X86_PF_USER) &&
!(regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_AC)))
- {
- bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, hw_error_code, address);
- return;
- }
+ goto bad_area_nosem;

/*
* If we're in an interrupt, have no user context or are running
* in a region with pagefaults disabled then we must not take the fault
*/
- if (unlikely(faulthandler_disabled() || !mm)) {
- bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, hw_error_code, address);
- return;
- }
+ if (unlikely(faulthandler_disabled() || !mm))
+ goto bad_area_nosem;

/*
* It's safe to allow irq's after cr2 has been saved and the
@@ -1385,8 +1374,7 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
* Fault from code in kernel from
* which we do not expect faults.
*/
- bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, hw_error_code, address);
- return;
+ goto bad_area_nosem;
}
retry:
down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
@@ -1400,20 +1388,14 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
}

vma = find_vma(mm, address);
- if (unlikely(!vma)) {
- bad_area(regs, hw_error_code, address);
- return;
- }
+ if (unlikely(!vma))
+ goto bad_area;
if (likely(vma->vm_start <= address))
goto good_area;
- if (unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN))) {
- bad_area(regs, hw_error_code, address);
- return;
- }
- if (unlikely(expand_stack(vma, address))) {
- bad_area(regs, hw_error_code, address);
- return;
- }
+ if (unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN)))
+ goto bad_area;
+ if (unlikely(expand_stack(vma, address)))
+ goto bad_area;

/*
* Ok, we have a good vm_area for this memory access, so
@@ -1483,6 +1465,12 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
}

check_v8086_mode(regs, address, tsk);
+ return;
+
+bad_area:
+ up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+bad_area_nosem:
+ bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, hw_error_code, address);
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(do_user_addr_fault);

--
2.17.1