Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: power: add Amlogic secure power domains bindings

[Martin Blumenstingl]

Hi Jianxin,

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add the bindings for the Amlogic Secure power domains, controlling the
> secure power domains.
>
> The bindings targets the Amlogic A1 and C1 compatible SoCs, in which the
> power domain registers are in secure world.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liang <zhiqiang.liang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bindings/power/amlogic,meson-sec-pwrc.yaml     | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/dt-bindings/power/meson-a1-power.h         | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/amlogic,meson-sec-pwrc.yaml
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/meson-a1-power.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/amlogic,meson-sec-pwrc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/amlogic,meson-sec-pwrc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..327e0d9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/amlogic,meson-sec-pwrc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +# Copyright (c) 2019 Amlogic, Inc
> +# Author: Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/power/amlogic,meson-sec-pwrc.yaml#";
> +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#";
> +
> +title: Amlogic Meson Secure Power Domains
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |+
> +  A1/C1 series The Secure Power Domains node should be the child of a syscon
> +  node with the required property.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - amlogic,meson-a1-pwrc
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    pwrc: power-controller {
> +          compatible = "amlogic,meson-a1-pwrc";
> +    };
not a comment about this binding but about the secure monitor in general:
there's a recent discussion about the secure monitor in the nvmem bindings: [0]


Martin


[0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg750010.html