RE: [PATCH 1/4] softirq: implement IRQ flood detection mechanism

[Long Li]

> >> Long, does this patch make any difference?
> >
> > Sagi,
> >
> > Sorry it took a while to bring my system back online.
> >
> > With the patch, the IOPS is about the same drop with the 1st patch. I think
> the excessive context switches are causing the drop in IOPS.
> >
> > The following are captured by "perf sched record" for 30 seconds during
> tests.
> >
> > "perf sched latency"
> > With patch:
> >    fio:(82)              | 937632.706 ms |  1782255 | avg:    0.209 ms | max:   63.123
> ms | max at:    768.274023 s
> >
> > without patch:
> >    fio:(82)              |2348323.432 ms |    18848 | avg:    0.295 ms | max:   28.446
> ms | max at:   6447.310255 s
> 
> Without patch means the proposed hard-irq patch?

It means the current upstream code without any patch. But It's prone to soft lockup.

Ming's proposed hard-irq patch gets similar results to "without patch", however it fixes the soft lockup.

> 
> If we are context switching too much, it means the soft-irq operation is not
> efficient, not necessarily the fact that the completion path is running in soft-
> irq..
> 
> Is your kernel compiled with full preemption or voluntary preemption?

The tests are based on Ubuntu 18.04 kernel configuration. Here are the parameters:

# CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set
CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set

> 
> > Look closer at each CPU, we can see ksoftirqd is competing CPU with
> > fio (and effectively throttle other fio processes) (captured in
> > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing, echo sched:* >set_event)
> >
> > On CPU1 with patch: (note that the prev_state for fio is "R", it's
> preemptively scheduled)
> >             <...>-4077  [001] d... 66456.805062: sched_switch: prev_comm=fio
> prev_pid=4077 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=ksoftirqd/1
> next_pid=17 next_prio=120
> >             <...>-17    [001] d... 66456.805859: sched_switch:
> prev_comm=ksoftirqd/1 prev_pid=17 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==>
> next_comm=fio next_pid=4077 next_prio=120
> >             <...>-4077  [001] d... 66456.844049: sched_switch: prev_comm=fio
> prev_pid=4077 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=ksoftirqd/1
> next_pid=17 next_prio=120
> >             <...>-17    [001] d... 66456.844607: sched_switch:
> prev_comm=ksoftirqd/1 prev_pid=17 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==>
> next_comm=fio next_pid=4077 next_prio=120
> >
> > On CPU1 without patch: (the prev_state for fio is "S", it's voluntarily
> scheduled)
> >            <idle>-0     [001] d...  6725.392308: sched_switch:
> prev_comm=swapper/1 prev_pid=0 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==>
> next_comm=fio next_pid=14342 next_prio=120
> >               fio-14342 [001] d...  6725.392332: sched_switch: prev_comm=fio
> prev_pid=14342 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=swapper/1
> next_pid=0 next_prio=120
> >            <idle>-0     [001] d...  6725.392356: sched_switch:
> prev_comm=swapper/1 prev_pid=0 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==>
> next_comm=fio next_pid=14342 next_prio=120
> >               fio-14342 [001] d...  6725.392425: sched_switch:
> > prev_comm=fio prev_pid=14342 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==>
> > next_comm=swapper/1 next_pid=0 next_prio=12