[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 21/44] dmaengine: iop-adma: use correct printk format strings
From: Sasha Levin
Date: Sun Sep 22 2019 - 15:04:00 EST
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 00c9755524fbaa28117be774d7c92fddb5ca02f3 ]
When compile-testing on other architectures, we get lots of warnings
about incorrect format strings, like:
drivers/dma/iop-adma.c: In function 'iop_adma_alloc_slots':
drivers/dma/iop-adma.c:307:6: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'dma_addr_t {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
drivers/dma/iop-adma.c: In function 'iop_adma_prep_dma_memcpy':
>> drivers/dma/iop-adma.c:518:40: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'size_t {aka long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
Use %zu for printing size_t as required, and cast the dma_addr_t
arguments to 'u64' for printing with %llx. Ideally this should use
the %pad format string, but that requires an lvalue argument that
doesn't work here.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809163334.489360-3-arnd@xxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/dma/iop-adma.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c b/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c
index e4f43125e0fbb..a390415c97a86 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c
@@ -126,9 +126,9 @@ static void __iop_adma_slot_cleanup(struct iop_adma_chan *iop_chan)
list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, _iter, &iop_chan->chain,
chain_node) {
pr_debug("\tcookie: %d slot: %d busy: %d "
- "this_desc: %#x next_desc: %#x ack: %d\n",
+ "this_desc: %#x next_desc: %#llx ack: %d\n",
iter->async_tx.cookie, iter->idx, busy,
- iter->async_tx.phys, iop_desc_get_next_desc(iter),
+ iter->async_tx.phys, (u64)iop_desc_get_next_desc(iter),
async_tx_test_ack(&iter->async_tx));
prefetch(_iter);
prefetch(&_iter->async_tx);
@@ -316,9 +316,9 @@ iop_adma_alloc_slots(struct iop_adma_chan *iop_chan, int num_slots,
int i;
dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev,
"allocated slot: %d "
- "(desc %p phys: %#x) slots_per_op %d\n",
+ "(desc %p phys: %#llx) slots_per_op %d\n",
iter->idx, iter->hw_desc,
- iter->async_tx.phys, slots_per_op);
+ (u64)iter->async_tx.phys, slots_per_op);
/* pre-ack all but the last descriptor */
if (num_slots != slots_per_op)
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dma_dest,
return NULL;
BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
- dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s len: %u\n",
+ dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s len: %zu\n",
__func__, len);
spin_lock_bh(&iop_chan->lock);
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_xor(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dma_dest,
BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_XOR_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev,
- "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u flags: %lx\n",
+ "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu flags: %lx\n",
__func__, src_cnt, len, flags);
spin_lock_bh(&iop_chan->lock);
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_xor_val(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t *dma_src,
if (unlikely(!len))
return NULL;
- dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u\n",
+ dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu\n",
__func__, src_cnt, len);
spin_lock_bh(&iop_chan->lock);
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_pq(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t *dst, dma_addr_t *src,
BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_XOR_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev,
- "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u flags: %lx\n",
+ "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu flags: %lx\n",
__func__, src_cnt, len, flags);
if (dmaf_p_disabled_continue(flags))
@@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_pq_val(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t *pq, dma_addr_t *src,
return NULL;
BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_XOR_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
- dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u\n",
+ dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu\n",
__func__, src_cnt, len);
spin_lock_bh(&iop_chan->lock);
--
2.20.1