RE: [PATCH RFC v4 1/1] random: WARN on large getrandom() waits and introduce getrandom2()

[David Laight]

From: Linus Torvalds
> Sent: 19 September 2019 21:04
...
> Note small detail above: I changed the ^= to a +=. Addition tends to
> be better (due to carry between bits) when there might be bit
> commonalities.  Particularly with something like a cycle count where
> two xors can mostly cancel out previous bits rather than move bits
> around in the word.

There is code in one on the kernel RNG that XORs together the output
of 3 LFSR (CRC) generators.
I think it is used for 'low quality' randomness and reseeded from the main RNG.
Using XOR makes the entire generator 'linear' and thus trivially reversible.
With a relatively small number of consecutive outputs you can determine the state
of all 3 LFSR.
Merge the results with addition and the process is immensely harder.

I've also wondered whether the RC4 generator is a useful entropy store?
It has a lot of state and you can fairly easily feed in values that might (or
might not) contain any randomness without losing any stored entropy.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)