Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix comment of f2fs_evict_inode

[Jaegeuk Kim]

Hi Chao,

On 09/25, Chao Yu wrote:
> evict() should be called once i_count is zero, rather than i_nlinke
> is zero.
> 
> Reported-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/inode.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> index db4fec30c30d..8262f4a483d3 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ int f2fs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Called at the last iput() if i_nlink is zero

I don't think this comment is wrong. You may be able to add on top of this.

> + * Called at the last iput() if i_count is zero
>   */
>  void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.18.0.rc1