Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix comment of f2fs_evict_inode

[Chao Yu]

On 2019/9/25 21:47, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Chao,
> 
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 05:30:50PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> evict() should be called once i_count is zero, rather than i_nlinke
>> is zero.
>>
>> Reported-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  fs/f2fs/inode.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
>> index db4fec30c30d..8262f4a483d3 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
>> @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ int f2fs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
>>  }
>>  
>>  /*
>> - * Called at the last iput() if i_nlink is zero
>> + * Called at the last iput() if i_count is zero
> 
> Yeah, I'd suggest taking some time to look at other
> inconsistent comments, it makes other folks confused
> and ask me with such-"strong" reason...

Xiang, I'm looking into it, will fix those inconsistent comments in another
patch, please wait a while. ;)

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
> 
>>   */
>>  void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
>>  {
>> -- 
>> 2.18.0.rc1
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>> Linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> .
>