Re: [PATCH] tpm: Salt tpm_get_random() result with get_random_bytes()

From: Jarkko Sakkinen
Date: Wed Oct 16 2019 - 06:43:28 EST


On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 01:38:05PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 02:04:50PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 03:47:02PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > Salt the result that comes from the TPM RNG with random bytes from the
> > > kernel RNG. This will allow to use tpm_get_random() as a substitute for
> > > get_random_bytes(). TPM could have a bug (making results predicatable),
> > > backdoor or even an inteposer in the bus. Salting gives protections
> > > against these concerns.
> >
> > Seems like a dangerous use case, why would any kernel user that cared
> > about quality of randomness ever call a tpm_* API to get quality
> > random data?
>
> This is related to this discussion:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/CAE=NcrY3BTvD-L2XP6bsO=9oAJLtSD0wYpUymVkAGAnYObsPzQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t
>
> I could also move this to the call site.

But I hear you anyway.

I think for trusted keys the best strategy would be to do
exactly this:

1. Generate one random value with get_random_bytes_arch()
2. Generate another with backend specific technology (we
have now two TPM and TEE) if an RNG available.
3. Xor the values together.

/Jarkko