Re: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: ep93xx: enable SPARSE_IRQ

[Alexander Sverdlin]

Hi!

On 20/10/2019 13:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> Ah, that makes sense. so all interrupt numbers need to
>>> be shifted by a fixed number (e.g. 1) like we did for
>>> other platforms (see attachment).
>> Yes, the below patch resolved both GPIO and DMA issues.
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Previous patch (selecting IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY) is not
>> required.
>>
>> If you re-spin all 3 ep93xx-relevant patches together, you can put my
>> Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxx>
>> on them.
> Awesome, thanks for testing.
> 
> I only remember sending two patches  for ep93xx:
>  ARM: ep93xx: make mach/ep93xx-regs.h local
>  ARM: ep93xx: enable SPARSE_IRQ
> 
> and have added the Tested-by tag to them now. Is there a third one
> I missed?

The patch shifting the IRQ-numbering by one is a prerequisite for the two
above patches, right?

--
Alex.