Re: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: ep93xx: enable SPARSE_IRQ

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:47 PM Alexander Sverdlin
<alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 20/10/2019 13:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> Ah, that makes sense. so all interrupt numbers need to
> >>> be shifted by a fixed number (e.g. 1) like we did for
> >>> other platforms (see attachment).
> >> Yes, the below patch resolved both GPIO and DMA issues.
>         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> Previous patch (selecting IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY) is not
> >> required.
> >>
> >> If you re-spin all 3 ep93xx-relevant patches together, you can put my
> >> Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> on them.
> > Awesome, thanks for testing.
> >
> > I only remember sending two patches  for ep93xx:
> >  ARM: ep93xx: make mach/ep93xx-regs.h local
> >  ARM: ep93xx: enable SPARSE_IRQ
> >
> > and have added the Tested-by tag to them now. Is there a third one
> > I missed?
>
> The patch shifting the IRQ-numbering by one is a prerequisite for the two
> above patches, right?

Ah, now I see what you mean. I had folded that change into the sparse-irq
change, but you are right that it makes more sense as a separate
changeset before the other ones. Changing that now.

Thanks,

       Arnd