Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2019-10-23 02:02:16)Yes. The idea is to go with latter option. Disable it in the board dts file if the
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm6150.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm6150.dtsi
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..20eb928e5ce3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm6150.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+// Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+
+#include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-vadc.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/input/linux-event-codes.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
+
+&spmi_bus {
+ pm6150_lsid0: pmic@0 {
+ compatible = "qcom,pm6150", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
+ reg = <0x0 SPMI_USID>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ pm6150_pon: pon@800 {
+ compatible = "qcom,pm8998-pon";
+ reg = <0x800>;
+ mode-bootloader = <0x2>;
+ mode-recovery = <0x1>;
Can this have status = "disabled"? Or is the idea that if the pmic power
button isn't used it should be disabled in the board dts file?
Will drop it in next series.+
+ pwrkey {
+ compatible = "qcom,pm8941-pwrkey";
+ interrupts = <0x0 0x8 0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>;
+ debounce = <15625>;
+ bias-pull-up;
+ linux,code = <KEY_POWER>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ pm6150_temp: temp-alarm@2400 {
+ compatible = "qcom,spmi-temp-alarm";
+ reg = <0x2400>;
+ interrupts = <0x0 0x24 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ io-channels = <&pm6150_adc ADC5_DIE_TEMP>;
+ io-channel-names = "thermal";
+ #thermal-sensor-cells = <0>;
+ };
+
+ pm6150_adc: adc@3100 {
+ compatible = "qcom,spmi-adc5";
+ reg = <0x3100>;
+ interrupts = <0x0 0x31 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ #io-channel-cells = <1>;
+
+ adc-chan@ADC5_DIE_TEMP {
+ reg = <ADC5_DIE_TEMP>;
+ label = "die_temp";
+ };
+ };
+
+ pm6150_gpio: gpios@c000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,pm6150-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
+ reg = <0xc000 0xa00>;
Drop the size?
Yes. We can remove them if we want to go with the way done for pm8998.+ gpio-controller;
+ #gpio-cells = <2>;
+ interrupts = <0 0xc0 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
+ <0 0xc1 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
+ <0 0xc2 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
+ <0 0xc3 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
+ <0 0xc4 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
+ <0 0xc5 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
+ <0 0xc6 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
+ <0 0xc7 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
+ <0 0xc8 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
+ <0 0xc9 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
Isn't this supposed to go away?
Ok.. We can go ahead with the pm8998 way as well. We will address it in next series.+
+ interrupt-names = "pm6150_gpio1", "pm6150_gpio2",
+ "pm6150_gpio3", "pm6150_gpio4",
+ "pm6150_gpio5", "pm6150_gpio6",
+ "pm6150_gpio7", "pm6150_gpio8",
+ "pm6150_gpio9", "pm6150_gpio10";
And this? And have gpio-ranges and use the irqdomain work. Basically,
should look like pm8998.
+ };
+ };
+
+ pm6150_lsid1: pmic@1 {
+ compatible = "qcom,pm6150", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
+ reg = <0x1 SPMI_USID>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ };
+};