Re: [PATCH v3 08/11] arm64: dts: qcom: pm6150: Add PM6150/PM6150L PMIC peripherals

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting kgunda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (2019-10-30 00:06:05)
> On 2019-10-29 22:08, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2019-10-23 02:02:16)
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm6150.dtsi 
> >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm6150.dtsi
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..20eb928e5ce3
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm6150.dtsi
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> >> +// Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> >> +
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-vadc.h>
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/input/linux-event-codes.h>
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
> >> +
> >> +&spmi_bus {
> >> +       pm6150_lsid0: pmic@0 {
> >> +               compatible = "qcom,pm6150", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
> >> +               reg = <0x0 SPMI_USID>;
> >> +               #address-cells = <1>;
> >> +               #size-cells = <0>;
> >> +
> >> +               pm6150_pon: pon@800 {
> >> +                       compatible = "qcom,pm8998-pon";
> >> +                       reg = <0x800>;
> >> +                       mode-bootloader = <0x2>;
> >> +                       mode-recovery = <0x1>;
> > 
> > Can this have status = "disabled"? Or is the idea that if the pmic 
> > power
> > button isn't used it should be disabled in the board dts file?
> > 
> Yes. The idea is to go with latter option. Disable it in the board dts 
> file if the
> pmic power button is not used.

Ok. Thanks.

> >> +
> >> +                       interrupt-names = "pm6150_gpio1", 
> >> "pm6150_gpio2",
> >> +                                       "pm6150_gpio3", 
> >> "pm6150_gpio4",
> >> +                                       "pm6150_gpio5", 
> >> "pm6150_gpio6",
> >> +                                       "pm6150_gpio7", 
> >> "pm6150_gpio8",
> >> +                                       "pm6150_gpio9", 
> >> "pm6150_gpio10";
> > 
> > And this? And have gpio-ranges and use the irqdomain work. Basically,
> > should look like pm8998.
> Ok.. We can go ahead with the pm8998 way as well. We will address it in 
> next series.

Yes please use the pm8998 way..