Re: [PATCH] crypto: caam - do not reset pointer size if caam_ptr_size is 64 bits

From: Horia Geanta
Date: Mon Nov 25 2019 - 13:00:44 EST

Next message: Nathan Chancellor: "Re: [PATCH] PCI/IOV: Fix memory leak in pci_iov_add_virtfn()"
Previous message: Jaegeuk Kim: "Re: [PATCH v2] loop: avoid EAGAIN, if offset or block_size are changed"
In reply to: Iuliana Prodan: "Re: [PATCH] crypto: caam - do not reset pointer size if caam_ptr_size is 64 bits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 11/25/2019 2:02 PM, Iuliana Prodan wrote:
> So, what's your suggestion? We shouldn't reset the MCFGR[PS] at all? We
> should use the value set by u-boot?
> Yes.

Horia

Next message: Nathan Chancellor: "Re: [PATCH] PCI/IOV: Fix memory leak in pci_iov_add_virtfn()"
Previous message: Jaegeuk Kim: "Re: [PATCH v2] loop: avoid EAGAIN, if offset or block_size are changed"
In reply to: Iuliana Prodan: "Re: [PATCH] crypto: caam - do not reset pointer size if caam_ptr_size is 64 bits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]