Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] RISC-V: Mark existing SBI as 0.1 SBI.

From: Anup Patel
Date: Mon Nov 25 2019 - 23:10:40 EST


On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 8:50 AM Atish Patra <atish.patra@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> As per the new SBI specification, current SBI implementation version
> is defined as 0.1 and will be removed/replaced in future. Each of the
> function call in 0.1 is defined as a separate extension which makes
> easier to replace them one at a time.
>
> Rename existing implementation to reflect that. This patch is just
> a preparatory patch for SBI v0.2 and doesn't introduce any functional
> changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> index 2570c1e683d3..96aaee270ded 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> @@ -9,17 +9,17 @@
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_SBI
> -#define SBI_SET_TIMER 0
> -#define SBI_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR 1
> -#define SBI_CONSOLE_GETCHAR 2
> -#define SBI_CLEAR_IPI 3
> -#define SBI_SEND_IPI 4
> -#define SBI_REMOTE_FENCE_I 5
> -#define SBI_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA 6
> -#define SBI_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID 7
> -#define SBI_SHUTDOWN 8
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_SET_TIMER 0x0
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR 0x1
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_CONSOLE_GETCHAR 0x2
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_CLEAR_IPI 0x3
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_SEND_IPI 0x4
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_REMOTE_FENCE_I 0x5
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA 0x6
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID 0x7
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_SHUTDOWN 0x8
>
> -#define SBI_CALL(which, arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3) ({ \
> +#define SBI_CALL(which, arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3) ({ \
> register uintptr_t a0 asm ("a0") = (uintptr_t)(arg0); \
> register uintptr_t a1 asm ("a1") = (uintptr_t)(arg1); \
> register uintptr_t a2 asm ("a2") = (uintptr_t)(arg2); \
> @@ -43,48 +43,50 @@
>
> static inline void sbi_console_putchar(int ch)
> {
> - SBI_CALL_1(SBI_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR, ch);
> + SBI_CALL_1(SBI_EXT_0_1_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR, ch);
> }
>
> static inline int sbi_console_getchar(void)
> {
> - return SBI_CALL_0(SBI_CONSOLE_GETCHAR);
> + return SBI_CALL_0(SBI_EXT_0_1_CONSOLE_GETCHAR);
> }
>
> static inline void sbi_set_timer(uint64_t stime_value)
> {
> #if __riscv_xlen == 32
> - SBI_CALL_2(SBI_SET_TIMER, stime_value, stime_value >> 32);
> + SBI_CALL_2(SBI_EXT_0_1_SET_TIMER, stime_value,
> + stime_value >> 32);
> #else
> - SBI_CALL_1(SBI_SET_TIMER, stime_value);
> + SBI_CALL_1(SBI_EXT_0_1_SET_TIMER, stime_value);
> #endif
> }
>
> static inline void sbi_shutdown(void)
> {
> - SBI_CALL_0(SBI_SHUTDOWN);
> + SBI_CALL_0(SBI_EXT_0_1_SHUTDOWN);
> }
>
> static inline void sbi_clear_ipi(void)
> {
> - SBI_CALL_0(SBI_CLEAR_IPI);
> + SBI_CALL_0(SBI_EXT_0_1_CLEAR_IPI);
> }
>
> static inline void sbi_send_ipi(const unsigned long *hart_mask)
> {
> - SBI_CALL_1(SBI_SEND_IPI, hart_mask);
> + SBI_CALL_1(SBI_EXT_0_1_SEND_IPI, hart_mask);
> }
>
> static inline void sbi_remote_fence_i(const unsigned long *hart_mask)
> {
> - SBI_CALL_1(SBI_REMOTE_FENCE_I, hart_mask);
> + SBI_CALL_1(SBI_EXT_0_1_REMOTE_FENCE_I, hart_mask);
> }
>
> static inline void sbi_remote_sfence_vma(const unsigned long *hart_mask,
> unsigned long start,
> unsigned long size)
> {
> - SBI_CALL_3(SBI_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA, hart_mask, start, size);
> + SBI_CALL_3(SBI_EXT_0_1_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA, hart_mask,
> + start, size);
> }
>
> static inline void sbi_remote_sfence_vma_asid(const unsigned long *hart_mask,
> @@ -92,7 +94,8 @@ static inline void sbi_remote_sfence_vma_asid(const unsigned long *hart_mask,
> unsigned long size,
> unsigned long asid)
> {
> - SBI_CALL_4(SBI_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID, hart_mask, start, size, asid);
> + SBI_CALL_4(SBI_EXT_0_1_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID, hart_mask,
> + start, size, asid);
> }
> #else /* CONFIG_RISCV_SBI */
> /* stubs for code that is only reachable under IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_SBI): */
> --
> 2.23.0
>

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Regards,
Anup