Re: [PATCH] kunit: test: Improve error messages for kunit_tool when kunitconfig is invalid
From: Brendan Higgins
Date: Tue Nov 26 2019 - 15:07:34 EST
+David Gow
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:33 AM 'Heidi Fahim' via KUnit Development
<kunit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Previous error message for invalid kunitconfig was vague. Added to it so
> that it lists invalid fields and prompts for them to be removed. Added
> validate_config function returning whether or not this kconfig is valid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heidi Fahim <heidifahim@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Looks good to me other than one minor nit below.
> ---
> tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> index bf3876835331..010d3f5030d2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> @@ -93,6 +93,19 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object):
> return False
> return True
>
> + def validate_config(self, build_dir):
> + kconfig_path = get_kconfig_path(build_dir)
> + validated_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig()
> + validated_kconfig.read_from_file(kconfig_path)
> + if not self._kconfig.is_subset_of(validated_kconfig):
> + invalid = self._kconfig.entries() - validated_kconfig.entries()
> + message = 'Provided Kconfig is not contained in validated .config. Invalid fields found in kunitconfig: %s' % (
nit: Rather than "Invalid fields found in kunitconfig", how about
something like "Following fields found in kunitconfig, but not
.config:"?
> + ', '.join([str(e) for e in invalid])
> + )
> + logging.error(message)
> + return False
> + return True
> +
> def build_config(self, build_dir):
> kconfig_path = get_kconfig_path(build_dir)
> if build_dir and not os.path.exists(build_dir):
Thanks for the patch!