Re: [PATCH 01/30] drm: Introduce drm_bridge_init()

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:05:56AM +0000, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 November 2019 19:24:45 GMT Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Hi Mihail.
> 
> Hi Sam,
> 
> > 
> > > Ack, but with one caveat: bridge->dev is the struct drm_device that is
> > > the bridge client, we need to add a bridge->device (patch 29 in this
> > > series) which is the struct device that will manage the bridge lifetime.
> > Other places uses the variable name "drm" for a drm_device.
> > This is less confusion than the "dev" name.
> > 
> > It seems a recent trend to use the variable name "drm" so you can find a
> > lot of places using "dev".
> > 
> > bike-shedding - but also about readability.
> > 
> > 	Sam
> > 
> 
> I'm okay with the idea, I can do a follow-up patch or series for the
> rename; I expect it would be a bit hefty to do it prior to this.
> 
> @Daniel, thoughts on s/bridge.dev/bridge.drm/ and
> s/bridge.device/bridge.dev/ after this series?

I'm firmly in the "no opionon" on this.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch