Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: vexpress-spc: Fix wrong alternation of policy->related_cpus during CPU hp

[Viresh Kumar]

On 27-11-19, 12:48, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> Since commit ca74b316df96 ("arm: Use common cpu_topology structure and
> functions.") the core cpumask has to be modified during cpu hotplug
> operations.
> 
> ("arm: Fix topology setup in case of CPU hotplug for CONFIG_SCHED_MC")
> [1] fixed that but revealed another issue on TC2, i.e in its cpufreq
> driver.
> 
> During CPU hp stress operations on multiple CPUs, policy->related_cpus
> can be altered. This is wrong since this cpumask should contain the
> online and offline CPUs.
> 
> The WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus)) in
> cpufreq_online() triggers in this case.
> 
> The core cpumask can't be used to set the policy->cpus in
> ve_spc_cpufreq_init() anymore in case it is called via
> cpuhp_cpufreq_online()->cpufreq_online()->cpufreq_driver->init().
> 
> An empty online() callback can be used to avoid that the init()
> driver function is called during CPU hotplug in so that
> policy->related_cpus will not be changed.
> 
> Implementing an online() also requires an offline() callback.
> 
> Tested on TC2 with CPU hp stress test (CPU hp from multiple CPUs at
> the same time).
> 
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191127103353.12417-1-dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>

Wanna provide any fixes tag ?

> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

This is 5.5 material or 5.6 ?

-- 
viresh