Re: [Patch v2 2/3] iommu: optimize iova_magazine_free_pfns()

From: Cong Wang
Date: Sat Nov 30 2019 - 01:02:47 EST


On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 5:24 AM John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 29/11/2019 00:48, Cong Wang wrote:
> > If the maganize is empty, iova_magazine_free_pfns() should
>
> magazine

Good catch!

>
> > be a nop, however it misses the case of mag->size==0. So we
> > should just call iova_magazine_empty().
> >
> > This should reduce the contention on iovad->iova_rbtree_lock
> > a little bit.
> >
> > Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/iova.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iova.c b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
> > index cb473ddce4cf..184d4c0e20b5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iova.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
> > @@ -797,13 +797,23 @@ static void iova_magazine_free(struct iova_magazine *mag)
> > kfree(mag);
> > }
> >
> > +static bool iova_magazine_full(struct iova_magazine *mag)
> > +{
> > + return (mag && mag->size == IOVA_MAG_SIZE);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool iova_magazine_empty(struct iova_magazine *mag)
> > +{
> > + return (!mag || mag->size == 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void
> > iova_magazine_free_pfns(struct iova_magazine *mag, struct iova_domain *iovad)
> > {
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int i;
> >
> > - if (!mag)
> > + if (iova_magazine_empty(mag))
>
> The only hot path we this call is
> __iova_rcache_insert()->iova_magazine_free_pfns(mag_to_free) and
> mag_to_free is full in this case, so I am sure how the additional check
> helps, right?

This is what I mean by "a little bit" in changelog, did you miss it or
misunderstand it? :)

Thanks.