Re: [PATCH v2] bluetooth: hci_bcm: enable IRQ capability from node

[Kevin Hilman]

guillaume La Roque <glaroque@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> hi Kevin,
>
>
> On 12/6/19 1:58 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Guillaume La Roque <glaroque@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Actually IRQ can be found from GPIO but all platorms don't support
>> nit: s/platorms/platforms/
> will fix in v3
>>> gpiod_to_irq, it's the case on amlogic chip.
>>> so to have possibility to use interrupt mode we need to add interrupts
>>> field in node and support it in driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Guillaume La Roque <glaroque@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> sorry for noise,
>>>
>>> v2 is for rebasing on master branch
>>>
>>> guillaume
>>>
>>>  drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c | 3 +++
>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c
>>> index f8f5c593a05c..9f52d57c56de 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c
>>> @@ -1409,6 +1409,7 @@ static int bcm_serdev_probe(struct serdev_device *serdev)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct bcm_device *bcmdev;
>>>  	const struct bcm_device_data *data;
>>> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
>>>  	int err;
>>>  
>>>  	bcmdev = devm_kzalloc(&serdev->dev, sizeof(*bcmdev), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> @@ -1421,6 +1422,8 @@ static int bcm_serdev_probe(struct serdev_device *serdev)
>>>  #endif
>>>  	bcmdev->serdev_hu.serdev = serdev;
>>>  	serdev_device_set_drvdata(serdev, bcmdev);
>>> +	pdev = to_platform_device(bcmdev->dev);
>>> +	bcmdev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> I don't know this driver well enough to be sure, but don't you need some
>> error checking here?
>>
>> If this fails (on platforms with no IRQ defined), is an error code in
>> bcmdev->irq going to affect later code that tries to setup IRQs?
>
> not needed to do something here because bcm_get_resources function check irq <=0 if yes it check if host-wakeup gpio was defined in node and try a gpiod_to_irq.
>
> at the end in bcm_request_irq function i check if irq <=0 if yes return EOPNOTSUPP
>

OK, sounds good.  Thanks for clarifying.

Kevin