Re: [PATCH v10 1/6] IMA: Check IMA policy flag

[Lakshmi Ramasubramanian]

On 12/10/19 2:42 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:

> Patch descriptions aren't suppose to be written as pseudo code. ÂStart
> with the current status and problem description.
>
> For example, "process_buffer_measurement() may be called prior to IMA being initialized, which would result in a kernel panic. ÂThis patch ..."
>
> Mimi

I'll update the patch description in this one and in the other patches 
per your comments.

Are you done reviewing all the patches in this set?

Other than the one code change per your comment on "[PATCH v10 5/6]" 
there are no other code changes I need to make?
Just wanted to confirm.

	[PATCH v10 5/6] IMA: Add support to limit measuring keys
=> With the additional "uid" support this isn't necessarily true any
more.

thanks,
 -lakshmi