Re: [PATCH v10 1/6] IMA: Check IMA policy flag

[Mimi Zohar]

On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 15:29 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On 12/10/19 2:42 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> 
> > Patch descriptions aren't suppose to be written as pseudo code. ÂStart
> > with the current status and problem description.
> > 
> > For example, "process_buffer_measurement() may be called prior to IMA being initialized, which would result in a kernel panic. ÂThis patch ..."
> > 
> > Mimi
> 
> I'll update the patch description in this one and in the other patches 
> per your comments.
> 
> Are you done reviewing all the patches in this set?
> 
> Other than the one code change per your comment on "[PATCH v10 5/6]" 
> there are no other code changes I need to make?
> Just wanted to confirm.
> 
> 	[PATCH v10 5/6] IMA: Add support to limit measuring keys
> => With the additional "uid" support this isn't necessarily true any
> more.

Yes, other than the code change needed for this and the patch
descriptions, it looks good. ÂAm continuing with reviewing the other
patch set - queueing "key" measurements.

Mimi