On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:31:29PM +0800, cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 2019-12-15 02:32, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 12/14/19 8:03 AM, Can Guo wrote:
> > In ufshcd_remove(), after SCSI host is removed, put it once so that
> > its
> > resources can be released.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > index b5966fa..a86b0fd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -8251,6 +8251,7 @@ void ufshcd_remove(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > ufs_bsg_remove(hba);
> > ufs_sysfs_remove_nodes(hba->dev);
> > scsi_remove_host(hba->host);
> > + scsi_host_put(hba->host);
> > /* disable interrupts */
> > ufshcd_disable_intr(hba, hba->intr_mask);
> > ufshcd_hba_stop(hba, true);
>
> Hi Can,
>
> The UFS driver may queue work asynchronously and that asynchronous
> work may refer to the SCSI host, e.g. ufshcd_err_handler(). Is it
> guaranteed that all that asynchronous work has finished before
> scsi_host_put() is called?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Hi Bart,
As SCSI host is allocated in ufshcd_platform_init() during platform
drive probe, it is much more appropriate if platform driver calls
ufshcd_dealloc_host() in their own drv->remove() path. How do you
think if I change it as below? If it is OK to you, please ignore my
previous mails.
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
index 3d4582e..ea45756 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -3239,6 +3239,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_remove(struct platform_device
*pdev)
pm_runtime_get_sync(&(pdev)->dev);
ufshcd_remove(hba);
+ ufshcd_dealloc_host(hba);
return 0;
}
Wait, why is this a platform device? Don't you hang off of a pci
device? Or am I missing something earlier in this patchset?
thanks,
greg k-h