Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Put SCSI host after remove it

From: cang
Date: Mon Dec 16 2019 - 19:46:05 EST


On 2019-12-17 01:39, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 12/16/19 6:31 AM, cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
As SCSI host is allocated in ufshcd_platform_init() during platform
drive probe, it is much more appropriate if platform driver calls
ufshcd_dealloc_host() in their own drv->remove() path. How do you
think if I change it as below? If it is OK to you, please ignore my
previous mails.

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
index 3d4582e..ea45756 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -3239,6 +3239,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)

ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ pm_runtime_get_sync(&(pdev)->dev);
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufshcd_remove(hba);
+ÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufshcd_dealloc_host(hba);
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ return 0;
Â}

Hi Can,

Apparently some UFS drivers call ufshcd_remove() only and others
(PCIe) call both ufshcd_remove() and ufshcd_dealloc_host(). I think
that the above change will cause trouble for the PCIe driver unless
the ufshcd_dealloc_host() call is removed from ufshcd_pci_remove().

Thanks,

Bart.

Hi Bart,

You may get me wrong. I mean we should do like what ufshcd-pci.c does.
As driver probe routine allocates SCSI host, then driver remove() should
de-allocate it. Meaning ufs_qcom_remove() should call both ufshcd_remove()
and ufshcd_dealloc_host().

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
index 3d4582e..ea45756 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -3239,6 +3239,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)

ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ pm_runtime_get_sync(&(pdev)->dev);
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufshcd_remove(hba);
+ÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufshcd_dealloc_host(hba);
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ return 0;
Â}

Thanks,

Can Guo.