Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Put SCSI host after remove it

[Bart Van Assche]

On 12/16/19 4:46 PM, cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 2019-12-17 01:39, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Apparently some UFS drivers call ufshcd_remove() only and others
> > (PCIe) call both ufshcd_remove() and ufshcd_dealloc_host(). I think
> > that the above change will cause trouble for the PCIe driver unless
> > the ufshcd_dealloc_host() call is removed from ufshcd_pci_remove().
>
> You may get me wrong. I mean we should do like what ufshcd-pci.c does.
> As driver probe routine allocates SCSI host, then driver remove() should
> de-allocate it. Meaning ufs_qcom_remove() should call both ufshcd_remove()
> and ufshcd_dealloc_host().
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> index 3d4582e..ea45756 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -3239,6 +3239,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_remove(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>
>  Â ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ pm_runtime_get_sync(&(pdev)->dev);
>  Â ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufshcd_remove(hba);
>  Â+ÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufshcd_dealloc_host(hba);
>  Â ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ return 0;
>  Â Â}

Hi Can,

If it is possible to move the ufshcd_dealloc_host() into ufshcd_remove() 
then I would prefer to do that. If all UFS transport drivers need that 
call then I think that call should happen from the UFS core instead of 
from the transport drivers.

Thanks,

Bart.