Re: [PATCH 1/4] phy: qcom-qmp: Increase the phy init timeout

[Vinod Koul]

On 19-12-19, 18:08, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 19 Dec 07:04 PST 2019, Vinod Koul wrote:
> 
> > If we do full reset of the phy, it seems to take a couple of ms to come
> > up on my system so increase the timeout to 10ms.
> > 
> > This was found by full reset addition by commit 870b1279c7a0
> > ("scsi: ufs-qcom: Add reset control support for host controller") and
> > fixes the regression to platforms by this commit.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This does look familiar...
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20191107000917.1092409-3-bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> > index 091e20303a14..c2e800a3825a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
> >  /* QPHY_V3_PCS_MISC_CLAMP_ENABLE register bits */
> >  #define CLAMP_EN				BIT(0) /* enables i/o clamp_n */
> >  
> > -#define PHY_INIT_COMPLETE_TIMEOUT		1000
> > +#define PHY_INIT_COMPLETE_TIMEOUT		100000
> 
> 100ms seems a little bit excessive, and we do end up waiting this long
> when we have PCIe links without an attached device...
> 
> Do you need >10ms or could we just have my patch merged?

Yeah I quick tested 10ms as well and seems good for me, so either ways
if fine, but lets get it applied quickly :-)

-- 
~Vinod