Re: [PATCH 1/4] phy: qcom-qmp: Increase the phy init timeout
From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Thu Dec 19 2019 - 21:08:41 EST
On Thu 19 Dec 07:04 PST 2019, Vinod Koul wrote:
> If we do full reset of the phy, it seems to take a couple of ms to come
> up on my system so increase the timeout to 10ms.
>
> This was found by full reset addition by commit 870b1279c7a0
> ("scsi: ufs-qcom: Add reset control support for host controller") and
> fixes the regression to platforms by this commit.
>
> Suggested-by: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
This does look familiar...
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20191107000917.1092409-3-bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx/
> ---
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> index 091e20303a14..c2e800a3825a 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
> /* QPHY_V3_PCS_MISC_CLAMP_ENABLE register bits */
> #define CLAMP_EN BIT(0) /* enables i/o clamp_n */
>
> -#define PHY_INIT_COMPLETE_TIMEOUT 1000
> +#define PHY_INIT_COMPLETE_TIMEOUT 100000
100ms seems a little bit excessive, and we do end up waiting this long
when we have PCIe links without an attached device...
Do you need >10ms or could we just have my patch merged?
Regards,
Bjorn
> #define POWER_DOWN_DELAY_US_MIN 10
> #define POWER_DOWN_DELAY_US_MAX 11
>
> --
> 2.23.0
>