Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: semantic patch to check for inappropriate do_div() calls

[Markus Elfring]

> +@initialize:python@
â
> +def construct_warnings(str, suggested_fun):

This function will be used only for the operation modes âorgâ and âreportâ.
Thus I suggest to replace the specification âinitializeâ by a corresponding dependency
which is already applied for the SmPL rule ârâ.


Can subsequent SmPL disjunctions become more succinct?


The passing of function name variants contains a bit of duplicate Python code.
Will a feature request like âSupport for SmPL rule groupsâ become more interesting
for the shown use case?
https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/164

Regards,
Markus