Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: (adt7475) Added missing adt7475 documentation

From: Logan Shaw
Date: Wed Jan 29 2020 - 18:53:00 EST


On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 11:27 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:30 PM Logan Shaw
> <Logan.Shaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 09:48 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:10:14AM +1300, Logan Shaw wrote:
> > > > Added a new file documenting the adt7475 devicetree and added
> > > > the
> > > > four
> > > > new properties to it.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Logan Shaw <logan.shaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > + bypass-attenuator-in0:
> > >
> > > Needs a vendor prefix and a type ref.
> >
> > Adi (Analog Devices) sold the ADT product line (amongst other
> > things)
> > to On Semiconductor. As changing the vendor of these chips (in
> > code)
> > would break backwards compatibility should we keep the vendor as
> > adi?
>
> Yes. It should match what's used in the compatible string(s).
>
> > To confirm, would this make the property "adi,adt7476,bypass-
> > attenuator-in0"?
> >
> > So used in conjunction with patternProperties you would end up with
> > something like:
> >
> > "adi,(adt7473|adt7475|adt7476|adt7490),bypass-attenuator-in[0134]"
>
> No for the part #'s. Just add 'adi,'. Maybe you thought for type ref
> that's what I meant? A type ref is:
>
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32

Yes, I was a little confused but now I am on the right track.