Re: [PATCH] mm: Allocate shrinker_map on appropriate NUMA node
From: David Hildenbrand
Date: Fri Jan 31 2020 - 09:57:20 EST
On 31.01.20 13:09, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> Despite shrinker_map may be touched from any cpu
> (e.g., a bit there may be set by a task running
> everywhere); kswapd is always bound to specific
> node. So, we will allocate shrinker_map from
> related NUMA node to respect its NUMA locality.
> Also, this follows generic way we use for allocation
> memcg's per-node data.
>
> Two hunks node_state() patterns are borrowed from
> alloc_mem_cgroup_per_node_info().
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 6f6dc8712e39..8ccc8ceb1b17 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int memcg_expand_one_shrinker_map(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> int size, int old_size)
> {
> struct memcg_shrinker_map *new, *old;
> - int nid;
> + int nid, tmp;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex);
>
> @@ -333,8 +333,9 @@ static int memcg_expand_one_shrinker_map(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> /* Not yet online memcg */
> if (!old)
> return 0;
> -
> - new = kvmalloc(sizeof(*new) + size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + /* See comment in alloc_mem_cgroup_per_node_info()*/
> + tmp = node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) ? nid : - 1;
> + new = kvmalloc_node(sizeof(*new) + size, GFP_KERNEL, tmp);
> if (!new)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -370,7 +371,7 @@ static void memcg_free_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> static int memcg_alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> {
> struct memcg_shrinker_map *map;
> - int nid, size, ret = 0;
> + int nid, size, tmp, ret = 0;
>
> if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> return 0;
> @@ -378,7 +379,9 @@ static int memcg_alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> mutex_lock(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex);
> size = memcg_shrinker_map_size;
> for_each_node(nid) {
> - map = kvzalloc(sizeof(*map) + size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + /* See comment in alloc_mem_cgroup_per_node_info()*/
> + tmp = node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) ? nid : - 1;
> + map = kvzalloc_node(sizeof(*map) + size, GFP_KERNEL, tmp);
> if (!map) {
> memcg_free_shrinker_maps(memcg);
> ret = -ENOMEM;
>
I think it is preferred to use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of -1.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb