Re: [RFC] why can't dynamic isolation just like the static way

[çè]

On 2020/2/11 äå7:43, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 04:17:34PM +0800, çè wrote:
>> Hi, folks
>>
>> We are dealing with isolcpus these days and try to do the isolation
>> dynamically.
>>
>> The kernel doc lead us into the cpuset.sched_load_balance, it's fine
>> to achieve the dynamic isolation with it, however we got problem with
>> the systemd stuff.
> 
> Then don't use systemd :-) Also, if systemd is the problem, why are you
> bugging us?

Well, that's... fair enough :-P

What we try to understand is why dynamic isolation is so different with
the way of static isolation, is it not good to have a simple way instead?

Regards,
Michael Wang

>