Re: [RFC] why can't dynamic isolation just like the static way

[çè]

On 2020/2/11 äå10:00, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:43:50 +0100
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 04:17:34PM +0800, çè wrote:
>>> Hi, folks
>>>
>>> We are dealing with isolcpus these days and try to do the isolation
>>> dynamically.
>>>
>>> The kernel doc lead us into the cpuset.sched_load_balance, it's fine
>>> to achieve the dynamic isolation with it, however we got problem with
>>> the systemd stuff.  
>>
>> Then don't use systemd :-) Also, if systemd is the problem, why are you
>> bugging us?
> 
> [ Background. Peter is someone that doesn't even use systemd. ;-) ]

I would be happy to get rid of that too ;-) but seems like it's getting
popular now as the basic init stuff, and I guess they have no idea about
how they are breaking the dynamic isolation.

Regards,
Michael Wang

> 
> -- Steve
>