Re: [PATCH v5 03/18] platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Introduce new SCU IPC API

From: Mika Westerberg
Date: Wed Feb 12 2020 - 07:45:15 EST

Next message: linmiaohe: "Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix WARN_ON check of an unsigned less than zero"
Previous message: Auger Eric: "Re: [PATCH V9 02/10] iommu/uapi: Define a mask for bind data"
In reply to: Andy Shevchenko: "Re: [PATCH v5 03/18] platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Introduce new SCU IPC API"
Next in thread: Mika Westerberg: "[PATCH v5 02/18] platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Log more information if SCU IPC command fails"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 01:55:41PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > No problem doing that but I'm not sure what's the benefit over what is
> > done now?
>
> That's what I'm trying to figure out. Would it be? Maybe you can play with it
> locally and decide which one is better?

OK, I'll try that.

Next message: linmiaohe: "Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix WARN_ON check of an unsigned less than zero"
Previous message: Auger Eric: "Re: [PATCH V9 02/10] iommu/uapi: Define a mask for bind data"
In reply to: Andy Shevchenko: "Re: [PATCH v5 03/18] platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Introduce new SCU IPC API"
Next in thread: Mika Westerberg: "[PATCH v5 02/18] platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Log more information if SCU IPC command fails"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]