Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] IMA: improve log messages in IMA
From: Mimi Zohar
Date: Wed Feb 12 2020 - 10:23:40 EST
Hi Tushar,
"in IMA" is redundant in the above Subject line.
On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 15:14 -0800, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
> Some files under IMA prefix the log statement with the respective file
> names and not with the string "ima". This is not consistent with the rest
> of the IMA files.
>
> The function process_buffer_measurement() does not have log messages for
> failure conditions.
>
> The #define for formatting log messages, pr_fmt, is duplicated in the
> files under security/integrity.
>
> This patchset addresses the above issues.
The cover letter should provide a summary of the problem(s) being
addressed by the individual patches, not a repetition of the
individual patch descriptions.
Mimi
>
> Tushar Sugandhi (3):
> add log prefix to ima_mok.c, ima_asymmetric_keys.c, ima_queue_keys.c
> add log message to process_buffer_measurement failure conditions
> add module name and base name prefix to log statements
>
> security/integrity/digsig.c | 2 --
> security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c | 2 --
> security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c | 2 --
> security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 2 --
> security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c | 2 --
> security/integrity/ima/Makefile | 6 +++---
> security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c | 2 --
> security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c | 2 --
> security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c | 2 --
> security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c | 2 --
> security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 1 -
> security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 5 +++--
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 --
> security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c | 2 --
> security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c | 2 --
> security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c | 2 --
> security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c | 2 --
> security/integrity/integrity.h | 6 ++++++
> 18 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>