Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: adjust to reservation.h renaming

[Daniel Vetter]

On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 02:56:06AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 11:39 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 01:08:32PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > > Am 04.03.20 um 13:07 schrieb Lukas Bulwahn:
> > > > Commit 52791eeec1d9 ("dma-buf: rename reservation_object to dma_resv")
> > > > renamed include/linux/reservation.h to include/linux/dma-resv.h, but
> > > > missed the reference in the MAINTAINERS entry.
> > > > 
> > > > Since then, ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test complains:
> > > > 
> > > >    warning: no file matches F: include/linux/reservation.h
> > > > 
> > > > Adjust the DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK entry in MAINTAINERS.
> > > > 
> > > > Co-developed-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@xxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@xxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > You'll push this too?
> > -Daniel
> > 
> > > > ---
> > > > Christian, please pick this patch.
> > > > applies cleanly on current master and next-20200303
> > > > 
> > > >   MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> > > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > index 6158a143a13e..3d6cb2789c9e 100644
> > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > @@ -5022,7 +5022,7 @@ L:	dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >   L:	linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for non-subscribers)
> > > >   F:	drivers/dma-buf/
> > > >   F:	include/linux/dma-buf*
> > > > -F:	include/linux/reservation.h
> > > > +F:	include/linux/dma-resv.h
> > > >   F:	include/linux/*fence.h
> > > >   F:	Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
> > > >   K:	dma_(buf|fence|resv)
> 
> Slightly unrelated:
> 
> The K: entry matches a lot of other things
> and may have a lot of false positive matches
> like any variable named dma_buffer
> 
> This should also use (?:...) to avoid a perl
> capture group.
> 
> Perhaps:
> 
> K:	'\bdma_(?:buf|fence|resv)\b'

Hm either people aren't using get_maintainers.pl consistently, or it
doesn't seem to be a real world problem. I'm not seeing any unrelated
patches on dri-devel at least.

But happy to merge such a patch if it shows up ofc, it's definitely the
more correct thing :-)
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch